I think the main in this work, the message of freedom. He argues that Christianity, with its solitude, fasting and sexual abstinence, won everything joyful, assertive and autocratic. as to morality and religion, Nietzsche praises the old Testament, neglecting the New Testament. Hmm… This kind of scientific antirealism, he argues that we ourselves have fabricated causes, relativity, compulsion, number, law, freedom, motive, purpose, determinism, etc. The laws of nature is just one interpretation of the phenomena observed by science. Schopenhauer was mistaken in thinking that nature will obvious, which actually is a very complex instrument of control over those who must obey. Kant returns to the prejudice of an old moralist with his categorical imperative, the dialectical rationale of which is just a smoke screen of His “ability” to explain the possibility of synthetic a priori judgments is compared with the explanation of the narcotic quality of opium.Ī. This is followed by attacks and insults: Spinoza masks his “personal timidity and vulnerability” by hiding behind the geometric method is inconsistent and makes self-preservation a fundamental engine in rejecting teleology.

He questioned the concept of past philosophy by asking the question: Why is humanity so vehemently wants to know the truth? And not to recognize the misleading “as a condition of life”? He offers a curious explanation of every past philosophy: each has been an “involuntary and unconscious memoir” on the part of its author and was created to justify the moral prejudices, which he solemnly declared as “truth”. The work moves into the realm “beyond good and evil” in the sense of a departure from the traditional morality which Nietzsche subjects to destructive criticism. In particular, he accuses them of creating metaphysical systems based on the belief that a good man is the opposite of the evil man, and not just another expression of the same basic impulses that find more direct expression in human evil. In this book “Beyond Good and Evil”, Nietzsche accuses past philosophers lack of critical sense and blind acceptance of dogmatic assumptions when considering morality.

Beyond good & evil book